Bridging Practices in Argumentation

Jocelyn Dunnack, Mansfield Middle School, Storrs, CT

CPM problems are ripe for teachers to promote the Standards for Mathematical Practice (SMPs), but as I have been repeatedly reminded this year, SMPs (like a lot of other things) take time, effort, and practice. I have been part of a research collaboration called Bridging Practices among Connecticut Mathematics Educators (BPCME), which brought together UConn researchers, graduate students, and teachers from urban, suburban and rural districts to learn about the third SMP: Students will construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others. We have developed resources to support teachers and students in the process of mathematical argumentation. Here
are a few things I have learned:

  1. Arguments are not describing your steps or showing your work. Arguments consist of claims, warrants, and evidence. You have to state a claim, and provide enough explicit evidence to prove you are right. It is more like those fun problems that have multiple strategies or solutions, the ones where students have to prove their solution was actually mathematically sound. Argument is about why you are right, mathematically speaking.
  2. At first, students needed to learn how to provide enough evidence. Then, they had to learn how to explain the reasoning as to why their evidence even mattered. That was much harder to do, and much more important.
  3. The CPM teachers in BPCME had no trouble implementing argumentation (and seeing growth in our students’ work). Great tasks were already part of our lessons! However, we did have to devote extra time for these tasks. By digging into a good argument question and skipping a few of the other questions in the lesson, we found deeper understanding than we previously got. It was definitely worth the investment and the sacrifice.

Our work will be compiled and submitted for publication approval by NCTM this summer. Even though I had already been doing argument tasks that existed in CPM, it was very powerful for me to see what happened when I made a conscious choice to explicitly teach a math practice, rather than just knowing it was embedded. Guess what? My kids could not really do it at first, but now they can! I am sure you are not surprised.

Statistics

JAVA

Calculus
Third Edition

Precalculus
Third Edition

Precalculus
Supplement

2.3.4

Defining Concavity

4.4.1

Characteristics of Polynomial Functions

5.2.6

Semi-Log Plots

5 Closure

Closure How Can I Apply It? Activity 3

9.3.1

Transition States

9.3.2

Future and Past States

10.3.1

The Parametrization of Functions, Conics, and Their Inverses

10.3.2

Vector-Valued Functions

11.1.5

Rate of Change of Polar Functions

Matemática
Integrada I

Matemática
Integrada II

Matemática
Integrada III

Integrated I

Integrated II

Integrated III

Core Connections en español, Álgebra

Core Connections en español, Geometría

Core Connections en español, Álgebra 2

Core Connections
Algebra

Core Connections Geometry

Core Connections
Algebra 2

Core Connections 1

Core Connections 2

Core Connections 3

Core Connections en español,
Curso 1
Core Connections en español,
Curso 2
Core Connections en español,
Curso 3

Inspiring Connections
Course 1

Inspiring Connections
Course 2

Inspiring Connections
Course 3

Sample Checkpoint

Newsletter Archives

You are now leaving cpm.org.

Did you want to leave cpm.org?

I want to leave cpmstg.wpengine.com.

No, I want to stay on cpmstg.wpengine.com

Algebra Tiles Blue Icon

Algebra Tiles Session

  • Used throughout CPM middle and high school courses
  • Concrete, geometric representation of algebraic concepts.
  • Two-hour virtual session,
  •  Learn how students build their conceptual understanding of simplifying algebraic expressions
  • Solving equations using these tools.  
  • Determining perimeter,
  • Combining like terms,
  • Comparing expressions,
  • Solving equations
  • Use an area model to multiply polynomials,
  • Factor quadratics and other polynomials, and
  • Complete the square.
  • Support the transition from a concrete (manipulative) representation to an abstract model of mathematics.

Foundations for Implementation

This professional learning is designed for teachers as they begin their implementation of CPM. This series contains multiple components and is grounded in multiple active experiences delivered over the first year. This learning experience will encourage teachers to adjust their instructional practices, expand their content knowledge, and challenge their beliefs about teaching and learning. Teachers and leaders will gain first-hand experience with CPM with emphasis on what they will be teaching. Throughout this series educators will experience the mathematics, consider instructional practices, and learn about the classroom environment necessary for a successful implementation of CPM curriculum resources.

Page 2 of the Professional Learning Progression (PDF) describes all of the components of this learning event and the additional support available. Teachers new to a course but who have previously attended Foundations for Implementation can choose to engage in the course Content Modules in the Professional Learning Portal rather than attending the entire series of learning events again.