All Articles News You Can Use

Article Title

PUBLISHED
WRITTEN BY CPM Educator CPM Educational Program
SHARE THIS ARTICLE

March 2026

In general, “notebook” is a noun: a person, place, or thing.

This year, we have tried to make it a verb: an action.

This year, we are math notebooking.

To understand what we are trying this year in math class, it helps to understand what we have tried in the past. CPM provides Toolkit Math Note Pages and Toolkit Learning Log Pages that can be printed and distributed to students. Over the past several years, I have intentionally built on this idea by developing a Geometry Toolkit.

Teacher standing in front of classroom

Each day in class, we began by writing a question on the whiteboard. This question served as our learning target—like an extension of the Learning Log Pages posed as a question. A few years ago, I wrote about this approach and called it the Goal of the Lesson. Students would copy this question into their Geometry Toolkit. We would then transition into exploring the core problems from a CPM lesson together. Often, the first problem or two worked well as whiteboard problems—students standing up, working in teams. I didn’t always have students work this way, and I now realize I was missing the boat until I consistently had students working vertically.

As the lesson progressed, I kept running into the same questions. When students finish a whiteboard problem, what, if anything, should they record? When we consolidated ideas as a class, where should that thinking live? In their notebooks? Their Toolkits? Their Learning Logs?

Later in the lesson, there were usually four to six problems ideal for students to try independently—six right-triangle trigonometry problems or four systems of linear equations, for example. We would work through these problems and board-report our answers. Once again, the same questions came up: Should these problems go in the Toolkit? The Learning Log? The notebook? 

On a daily basis, students asked where their work belonged.

Then came the issue of resource pages. What should we do with them? Put them in their folders? Throw them away? Copy down important information students might want to keep? And if they did keep it—where should it go: the Toolkit, the Learning Log, or the notebook?

This year, I decided to give math notebooking a try. It draws heavily on ideas I have read about Science Notebooking and brings structure and purpose to students’ written work.

The Table of Contents

Every notebook begins with a Table of Contents, allowing students to quickly locate notes, tools, and past lessons. This turns the notebook into a reliable study guide rather than a pile of papers. Students glue or tape this to the inside front cover. During the first days of school, we number the pages of their notebooks together. Students start on page 1 and count to 10, then continue numbering pages on their own throughout the year.

Table of contents

Goal for the Week

Next, students glue a goal-setting page onto the first page of their notebook. Each week, they set a math goal and a non-math goal, giving purpose to their learning and helping them focus on specific skills or habits. Every Monday morning, students take time to reflect and write new goals for the week.

Toolkit Sections

Every CPM chapter has two to three sections. For example, Section 1.2 in CCG focuses on transformations, Section 2.1 focuses on angle relationships, and Section 2.2 focuses on area of shapes. At the start of each section, I pass out Toolkit Section Headers that students glue at the top of a page in the notebook. These Toolkit Sections mark the beginning of new content. The book pages listed provide references to Methods & Meanings boxes in the textbook, and the homework problems listed at the top serve as examples of the types of problems students should be able to complete to demonstrate proficiency in that section.

Resource Pages

What do we do with them? We figured it out.

Students cut out the most useful parts and glue them directly into their notebooks. For example, students cut out portions of the 1.2.1 Resource Page on reflections and the 1.2.4 Resource Page on rotations and glued them into Section 1.2. These pages serve as clear examples of transformations and become valuable references later in the year.

Additional Resources 

Entrance Slips, Exit Tickets, and other Formative Assessments:

Students tape or glue these questions in the corresponding section as examples of rigor.  

Supplies

In the room, we have eight containers with supplies that make math notebooking more efficient. When we need supplies, we ask the Resource Managers to get a supply container for the team. Each container contains: scissors, glue sticks, tape, markers, and highlighters.

The Three Questions

Students often ask three questions about math class:

  1. When is the test?
  2. What’s on the test?
  3. Can you give me questions like what will be on the test?

The Toolkit Sections help answer questions two and three. When I tell students that Section 2.1 (Angle Relationships) will be on the test, they know exactly where to look in their notebook. They also have homework problems listed on the section header that they can use as practice and review.

Notebooking

Math Notebooking is still a work in progress, but it has already brought clarity and consistency to our daily routines. Students know where to look, what to keep, and how to study. Moving forward, I plan to refine the Toolkit Sections and build in more opportunities for students to reflect on their learning within the notebook itself. The goal is simple: to make the notebook a living document that supports understanding, organization, and long-term retention.

I feel like math notebooking (verb) has made the math notebook (noun) awesome (adjective).

Picture of Brian Ryczkowski

Brian Ryczkowski

Titletown, USA

Listen
The CPM Podcast

Conversations with educators about what works in math classrooms.

Browse Episodes
Grow as an Educator
CPM Professional Learning
Academy of Best Practices
Teacher Research Collaborative
Regional Workshops
Explore PL
For Families
Supporting Your Student
Family Hub
CPM Shop
Textbooks & Resources
Textbooks & eBooks
Teacher Editions
Toolkits
Visit the Shop

Statistics

JAVA

Calculus
Third Edition

Precalculus
Third Edition

Precalculus
Supplement

2.3.4

Defining Concavity

4.4.1

Characteristics of Polynomial Functions

5.2.6

Semi-Log Plots

5 Closure

Closure How Can I Apply It? Activity 3

9.3.1

Transition States

9.3.2

Future and Past States

10.3.1

The Parametrization of Functions, Conics, and Their Inverses

10.3.2

Vector-Valued Functions

11.1.5

Rate of Change of Polar Functions

Matemática
Integrada I

Matemática
Integrada II

Matemática
Integrada III

Integrated I

Integrated II

Integrated III

Core Connections en español, Álgebra

Core Connections en español, Geometría

Core Connections en español, Álgebra 2

Core Connections
Algebra

Core Connections Geometry

Core Connections
Algebra 2

Core Connections 1

Core Connections 2

Core Connections 3

Core Connections en español,
Curso 1
Core Connections en español,
Curso 2
Core Connections en español,
Curso 3

Inspiring Connections
Course 1

Inspiring Connections
Course 2

Inspiring Connections
Course 3

Sample Checkpoint

You are now leaving cpm.org.

Did you want to leave cpm.org?

I want to leave cpmstg.wpengine.com.

No, I want to stay on cpmstg.wpengine.com

Algebra Tiles Blue Icon

Algebra Tiles Session

  • Used throughout CPM middle and high school courses
  • Concrete, geometric representation of algebraic concepts.
  • Two-hour virtual session,
  •  Learn how students build their conceptual understanding of simplifying algebraic expressions
  • Solving equations using these tools.  
  • Determining perimeter,
  • Combining like terms,
  • Comparing expressions,
  • Solving equations
  • Use an area model to multiply polynomials,
  • Factor quadratics and other polynomials, and
  • Complete the square.
  • Support the transition from a concrete (manipulative) representation to an abstract model of mathematics..

Foundations for Implementation

This professional learning is designed for teachers as they begin their implementation of CPM. This series contains multiple components and is grounded in multiple active experiences delivered over the first year. This learning experience will encourage teachers to adjust their instructional practices, expand their content knowledge, and challenge their beliefs about teaching and learning. Teachers and leaders will gain first-hand experience with CPM with emphasis on what they will be teaching. Throughout this series educators will experience the mathematics, consider instructional practices, and learn about the classroom environment necessary for a successful implementation of CPM curriculum resources.

Page 2 of the Professional Learning Progression (PDF) describes all of the components of this learning event and the additional support available. Teachers new to a course, but have previously attended Foundations for Implementation, can choose to engage in the course Content Modules in the Professional Learning Portal rather than attending the entire series of learning events again.

Building on Instructional Practice Series

The Building on Instructional Practice Series consists of three different events – Building on Discourse, Building on Assessment, Building on Equity – that are designed for teachers with a minimum of one year of experience teaching with CPM instructional materials and who have completed the Foundations for Implementation Series.

Building on Equity

In Building on Equity, participants will learn how to include equitable practices in their classroom and support traditionally underserved students in becoming leaders of their own learning. Essential questions include: How do I shift dependent learners into independent learners? How does my own math identity and cultural background impact my classroom? The focus of day one is equitable classroom culture. Participants will reflect on how their math identity and mindsets impact student learning. They will begin working on a plan for Chapter 1 that creates an equitable classroom culture. The focus of day two and three is implementing equitable tasks. Participants will develop their use of the 5 Practices for Orchestrating Meaningful Mathematical Discussions and curate strategies for supporting all students in becoming leaders of their own learning. Participants will use an equity lens to reflect on and revise their Chapter 1 lesson plans.

Building on Assessment

In Building on Assessment, participants will apply assessment research and develop methods to provide feedback to students and inform equitable assessment decisions. On day one, participants will align assessment practices with learning progressions and the principle of mastery over time as well as write assessment items. During day two, participants will develop rubrics, explore alternate types of assessment, and plan for implementation that supports student ownership. On the third day, participants will develop strategies to monitor progress and provide evidence of proficiency with identified mathematics content and practices. Participants will develop assessment action plans that will encourage continued collaboration within their learning community.

Building on Discourse

In Building on Discourse, participants will improve their ability to facilitate meaningful mathematical discourse. This learning experience will encourage participants to adjust their instructional practices in the areas of sharing math authority, developing independent learners, and the creation of equitable classroom environments. Participants will plan for student learning by using teaching practices such as posing purposeful questioning, supporting productive struggle, and facilitating meaningful mathematical discourse. In doing so, participants learn to support students collaboratively engaged with rich tasks with all elements of the Effective Mathematics Teaching Practices incorporated through intentional and reflective planning.