The Gift of a Pebble in Your Shoe: The Great Responsibility of Grading in a Math Classroom

May 2025

teacher presenting in front of classroom

As snow begins to melt and temperatures start to rise, “Spring Cleaning” is the term often used around this time of year when households determine what is still usable and what is no longer needed. In the same way, at least for me, this time of the school year was when I started to think about changes I was going to make for the next school year. From classroom starting routines to homework, I regularly reflected about what worked this past school year and what needed tweaking. Of all the things I considered changing each year, my grading policies and practices were always at the top of the list. A student’s grade in my class was the most important thing to them, as it was either a gateway to the next level or a roadblock in need of repeating.

Have you ever tried to walk with a pebble in your shoe? At first, most of us probably think we can just keep going and we’ll just tolerate the discomfort until we reach our destination. But it seems that eventually, that nagging little pebble can no longer be ignored. It becomes something that needs to be addressed. In that same way, the purpose of this article is not to advocate for one grading policy over another. There’s plenty of opinions and information already out there. Instead, the goal of this article is to put a “grading” pebble in your shoe. I want to provide you with some of the reflection questions I considered each year as I determined what components needed to be adjusted to better fit my class. 

What is your grading philosophy?

The most important component of your grading policies and procedures is your philosophy about what a student’s grade represents. If the answer to this question is not clear to you, there is likely a misalignment between how you assign a grade and the components that grade is made of. Like a home with a solid foundation, your grading philosophy should be the bedrock for which the rest of your grading policies and procedures are built on. So, I pose these questions for you to consider: 

  • What does a student’s grade in your classroom represent?
  • Does the grade represent content knowledge proficiency? 
  • Does the grade represent effort? 
  • Is it a combination of both?

Again, I am not advocating for any particular philosophy, but if your answer to this question is not solidified for you, there is going to be a danger that your grading practices and student’s grades are not reflecting your goals for the classroom.

Do the components and percentages of your gradebook support your philosophy?

Now that you have your philosophy in place about what a student’s grade in your class should represent, you should begin to analyze the components of your gradebook. The items and percentages that make up your gradebook should align and be consistent with your philosophy. For example, if you believe that a student’s grade should represent their content knowledge proficiency, does it make sense to have a “participation” component in your gradebook? Similarly, if you believe that effort should be accounted for in a student’s grade, is the correct balance reflected in your grading percentages? Even amongst assessments, in order to be consistent and support your grading philosophy, should you separate formative and summative assessments?

There’s no right or wrong answer to these questions in the objective sense. But it is critical that your answers align with your beliefs.

Do your grading practices reflect your philosophy?

Now that you have your philosophy set and your grading components finalized, the last factor to consider is how you will assign student grades. From assigning numerical scores to letter grades to a simple + or –, the way that you assign students their grades needs to be consistent with your philosophy. If you hold the belief that student proficiency is more of a spectrum, perhaps you will want to consider using rubrics. Or, if your philosophy guides you to place an emphasis on procedural fluency, you may find it necessary to deduct points for each mistake. Whatever method of grading you settle on, just be sure that there is cohesion between your philosophy and gradebook components as well.

Grading is a complex part of education, one that will never have unanimous agreement. That’s a good thing. It means that you have the authority to make the grading system your own and tailor it to fit your beliefs about what a grade should represent. But with such great power, comes a great responsibility. 

The questions I have posed are designed to inspire reflection about the why, what, and how of your grading practices. Once you find the balance and alignment between them, you will be on your way to creating a grading system that not only reflects your beliefs, but also creates a more equitable experience for your students. So as you head down the path to summer and another school year, I hope you take a few moments to address these grading pebbles.

Picture of Adam Varnes

Adam Varnes

CPM Professional Learning Specialist

Inspiring Connections Course 1

Statistics

JAVA

Calculus
Third Edition

Precalculus
Third Edition

Precalculus
Supplement

2.3.4

Defining Concavity

4.4.1

Characteristics of Polynomial Functions

5.2.6

Semi-Log Plots

5 Closure

Closure How Can I Apply It? Activity 3

9.3.1

Transition States

9.3.2

Future and Past States

10.3.1

The Parametrization of Functions, Conics, and Their Inverses

10.3.2

Vector-Valued Functions

11.1.5

Rate of Change of Polar Functions

Matemática
Integrada I

Matemática
Integrada II

Matemática
Integrada III

Integrated I

Integrated II

Integrated III

Core Connections en español, Álgebra

Core Connections en español, Geometría

Core Connections en español, Álgebra 2

Core Connections
Algebra

Core Connections Geometry

Core Connections
Algebra 2

Core Connections 1

Core Connections 2

Core Connections 3

Core Connections en español,
Curso 1
Core Connections en español,
Curso 2
Core Connections en español,
Curso 3

Inspiring Connections
Course 1

Inspiring Connections
Course 2

Inspiring Connections
Course 3

You are now leaving cpm.org.

Did you want to leave cpm.org?

I want to leave cpm.org.

No, I want to stay on cpm.org

Algebra Tiles Blue Icon
  • Used throughout CPM middle and high school courses
  • Concrete, geometric representation of algebraic concepts.
  • Two-hour virtual session,
  •  Learn how students build their conceptual understanding of simplifying algebraic expressions
  • Solving equations using these tools.  
  • Determining perimeter,
  • Combining like terms,
  • Comparing expressions,
  • Solving equations
  • Use an area model to multiply polynomials,
  • Factor quadratics and other polynomials, and
  • Complete the square.
  • Support the transition from a concrete (manipulative) representation to an abstract model of mathematics..

Foundations for Implementation

This professional learning is designed for teachers as they begin their implementation of CPM. This series contains multiple components and is grounded in multiple active experiences delivered over the first year. This learning experience will encourage teachers to adjust their instructional practices, expand their content knowledge, and challenge their beliefs about teaching and learning. Teachers and leaders will gain first-hand experience with CPM with emphasis on what they will be teaching. Throughout this series educators will experience the mathematics, consider instructional practices, and learn about the classroom environment necessary for a successful implementation of CPM curriculum resources.

Page 2 of the Professional Learning Progression (PDF) describes all of the components of this learning event and the additional support available. Teachers new to a course, but have previously attended Foundations for Implementation, can choose to engage in the course Content Modules in the Professional Learning Portal rather than attending the entire series of learning events again.

Edit Content

Building on Instructional Practice Series

The Building on Instructional Practice Series consists of three different events – Building on Discourse, Building on Assessment, Building on Equity – that are designed for teachers with a minimum of one year of experience teaching with CPM instructional materials and who have completed the Foundations for Implementation Series.

Building on Equity

In Building on Equity, participants will learn how to include equitable practices in their classroom and support traditionally underserved students in becoming leaders of their own learning. Essential questions include: How do I shift dependent learners into independent learners? How does my own math identity and cultural background impact my classroom? The focus of day one is equitable classroom culture. Participants will reflect on how their math identity and mindsets impact student learning. They will begin working on a plan for Chapter 1 that creates an equitable classroom culture. The focus of day two and three is implementing equitable tasks. Participants will develop their use of the 5 Practices for Orchestrating Meaningful Mathematical Discussions and curate strategies for supporting all students in becoming leaders of their own learning. Participants will use an equity lens to reflect on and revise their Chapter 1 lesson plans.

Building on Assessment

In Building on Assessment, participants will apply assessment research and develop methods to provide feedback to students and inform equitable assessment decisions. On day one, participants will align assessment practices with learning progressions and the principle of mastery over time as well as write assessment items. During day two, participants will develop rubrics, explore alternate types of assessment, and plan for implementation that supports student ownership. On the third day, participants will develop strategies to monitor progress and provide evidence of proficiency with identified mathematics content and practices. Participants will develop assessment action plans that will encourage continued collaboration within their learning community.

Building on Discourse

In Building on Discourse, participants will improve their ability to facilitate meaningful mathematical discourse. This learning experience will encourage participants to adjust their instructional practices in the areas of sharing math authority, developing independent learners, and the creation of equitable classroom environments. Participants will plan for student learning by using teaching practices such as posing purposeful questioning, supporting productive struggle, and facilitating meaningful mathematical discourse. In doing so, participants learn to support students collaboratively engaged with rich tasks with all elements of the Effective Mathematics Teaching Practices incorporated through intentional and reflective planning.